2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2005 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 85 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (250 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (228 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki XL7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2005 Suzuki XL7 | |
Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
Model | 6 | XL7 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2486 cc | 2737 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 64 L |