2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP) has 141 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 880 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 6 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 245 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 87 L |