2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2006 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Bluebird (126 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Bluebird (175 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2006 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 6 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 126 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |