2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2007 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 2007 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2007 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 6 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |