2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Bravo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Fiat Bravo (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (147 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2010 Fiat Bravo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2010 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Mazda | Fiat |
Model | 6 | Bravo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1367 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Top Speed | 212 km/hour | 212 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 58 L |