2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 6 | E-350 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 5400 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1806 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 57 L |