2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2010 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Transit Connect is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Transit Connect (136 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Transit Connect should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Transit Connect weights approximately 619 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Transit Connect (173 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Transit Connect will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2010 Ford Transit Connect | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 6 | Transit Connect |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 136 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 173 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 1574 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4587 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 2014 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 58 L |