2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Lexus SC
To start off, 2010 Lexus SC is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Lexus SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lexus SC (282 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lexus SC should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lexus SC weights approximately 690 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Lexus SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Lexus SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lexus SC (430 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Lexus SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 2010 Lexus SC | |
| Make | Mazda | Lexus |
| Model | 6 | SC |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2488 cc | 4293 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 169 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 91.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 82.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.5 seconds | 6.2 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1815 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 75 L |
