2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Peugeot 407
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 407 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,720 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 407 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 407 (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 407 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 407 (440 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (167 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 407 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6. 2010 Peugeot 407 has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Peugeot 407 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2010 Peugeot 407 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 6 | 407 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2487 cc | 2720 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1410 mm |