2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W (222 HP) has 118 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 SsangYong Chairman W. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W (296 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2010 SsangYong Chairman W will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2010 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
Model | 6 | Chairman W |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 222 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 296 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1495 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |