2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2011 Fiat Siena
To start off, 2011 Fiat Siena is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 204 kg more than 2011 Fiat Siena.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Fiat Siena. (135 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2011 Fiat Siena | |
Make | Mazda | Fiat |
Model | 6 | Siena |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1697 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 20.3:1 |
Top Speed | 212 km/hour | 160 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.2 seconds | 16.3 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1294 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.2 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 47 L |