2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2011 Honda CR-Z. (122 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2011 Honda CR-Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 98 kg more than 2011 Honda CR-Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Honda CR-Z. (173 Nm @ 1000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Honda CR-Z.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | 6 | CR-Z |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1500 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1294 kg | 1196 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2436 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 40 L |