2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2012 Audi A1
To start off, 2012 Audi A1 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (147 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2012 Audi A1. (104 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi A1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 315 kg more than 2012 Audi A1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A1 (250 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Audi A1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2012 Audi A1 | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | 6 | A1 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Top Speed | 212 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 34 L |