2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2012 Ford F-150
To start off, 2012 Ford F-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-150 (360 HP) has 256 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1715 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-150 (515 Nm) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2012 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2012 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 6 | F-150 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 515 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 2670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1928 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 136 L |