2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 1705 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford E-Series is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford E-Series. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 6 | E-Series |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2488 cc | 5400 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 474 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.06:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 12 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2017 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 150 L |