2009 Mazda B2300 vs. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara
To start off, 2009 Mazda B2300 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Monteverdi Sahara would be higher. At 3,253 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Monteverdi Sahara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda B2300 (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. (81 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1978 Monteverdi Sahara.
Because 2009 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda B2300 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda B2300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda B2300 | 1978 Monteverdi Sahara | |
Make | Mazda | Monteverdi |
Model | B2300 | Sahara |
Year Released | 2009 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2266 cc | 3253 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2550 mm |