2009 Mazda B2300 vs. 1979 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2009 Mazda B2300 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 2,266 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda B2300 (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 2101.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Zastava 2101. (88 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda B2300 | 1979 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | Mazda | Zastava |
| Model | B2300 | 2101 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1979 |
| Engine Size | 2266 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2430 mm |
