2009 Mazda B2300 vs. 1996 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2009 Mazda B2300 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Subaru Outback (165 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2009 Mazda B2300. (143 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda B2300.
Because 1996 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda B2300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Subaru Outback (221 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda B2300. (209 Nm). This means 1996 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda B2300.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda B2300 | 1996 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Mazda | Subaru |
Model | B2300 | Outback |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2266 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 209 Nm | 221 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2530 mm |