2009 Mazda B4000 vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Mazda B4000 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,034 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda B4000 (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda B4000 should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda B4000 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda B4000 (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda B4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda B4000 | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | B4000 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4034 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 64 L |