2009 Mazda BT-50 vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (123 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda BT-50 | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | BT-50 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2606 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 206 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2540 mm |
