2009 Mazda BT-50 vs. 1962 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1962 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1962 Triumph Herald.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Triumph Herald. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda BT-50 | 1962 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | BT-50 | Herald |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2953 cc | 1146 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 180 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2320 mm |