2009 Mazda BT-50 vs. 1963 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 3,689 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Plymouth Valiant weights approximately 350 kg more than 2009 Mazda BT-50.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda BT-50 | 1963 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
Model | BT-50 | Valiant |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 3689 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2700 mm |