2009 Mazda BT-50 vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 5,341 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (212 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (141 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 516 kg more than 1963 Pontiac Tempest.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda BT-50 | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
| Model | BT-50 | Tempest |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 5341 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1866 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2930 mm |
