2009 Mazda BT-50 vs. 1963 Riley One-Point-Five
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Riley One-Point-Five. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Riley One-Point-Five would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1963 Riley One-Point-Five. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1963 Riley One-Point-Five.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Riley One-Point-Five. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Riley One-Point-Five. (112 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Riley One-Point-Five.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda BT-50 | 1963 Riley One-Point-Five | |
Make | Mazda | Riley |
Model | BT-50 | One-Point-Five |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2953 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 180 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 73.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2190 mm |