2009 Mazda BT-50 vs. 1966 Saab 96
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Saab 96. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Saab 96 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1966 Saab 96. (64 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1966 Saab 96.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Saab 96. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Saab 96. (116 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Saab 96.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda BT-50 | 1966 Saab 96 | |
| Make | Mazda | Saab |
| Model | BT-50 | 96 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2953 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 180 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 58.9 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2500 mm |
