2009 Mazda BT-50 vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (180 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda BT-50.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (330 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. (258 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda BT-50 | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | BT-50 | 280 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 180 HP |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 86.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 78.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2410 mm |
