2009 Mazda BT-50 vs. 1978 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 1500.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Zastava 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda BT-50 | 1978 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Mazda | Zastava |
| Model | BT-50 | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2953 cc | 1479 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 113 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 180 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2430 mm |
