2009 Mazda BT-50 vs. 1980 Nissan Cherry
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Cherry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Cherry would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Nissan Cherry. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda BT-50 | 1980 Nissan Cherry | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | BT-50 | Cherry |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2953 cc | 988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2400 mm |
