2009 Mazda BT-50 vs. 1986 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (141 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1986 Renault Rodeo. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1986 Renault Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 1146 kg more than 1986 Renault Rodeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Renault Rodeo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (330 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Renault Rodeo. (75 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Renault Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda BT-50 | 1986 Renault Rodeo | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | BT-50 | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 75 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 70.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1866 kg | 720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 34 L |