2009 Mazda BT-50 vs. 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 (220 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda BT-50.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320. (310 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda BT-50 | 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | BT-50 | 320 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2953 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 180 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2810 mm |