2009 Mazda BT-50 vs. 1996 Volvo 460
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo 460 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1996 Volvo 460. (82 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo 460.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Volvo 460. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volvo 460. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volvo 460.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda BT-50 | 1996 Volvo 460 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | BT-50 | 460 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2953 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 180 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 83.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2510 mm |
