2009 Mazda BT-50 vs. 2003 Tata Indica

To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Tata Indica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Tata Indica would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2003 Tata Indica. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 2003 Tata Indica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 25 kg more than 2003 Tata Indica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Tata Indica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Tata Indica. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Tata Indica.

Compare all specifications: