2009 Mazda BT-50 vs. 2004 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Frontier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Frontier would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Frontier (181 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 699 kg more than 2009 Mazda BT-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Frontier (274 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (257 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda BT-50.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda BT-50 | 2004 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | BT-50 | Frontier |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 3278 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 181 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 274 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 19.8:1 | 8.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 1654 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 73 L |