2009 Mazda BT-50 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (123 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda BT-50.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda BT-50.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda BT-50 | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | BT-50 | Raider |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2604 cc | 3704 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 83 L |