2009 Mazda BT-50 vs. 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda BT-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda BT-50 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (141 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda BT-50 | 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
Make | Mazda | Aston Martin |
Model | BT-50 | Cygnet |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 4 L/100km |