2009 Mazda CX-7 vs. 1955 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1955 Talbot T 26. (197 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1955 Talbot T 26.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Talbot T 26. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-7 | 1955 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Mazda | Talbot |
| Model | CX-7 | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1890 mm |
