2009 Mazda CX-7 vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 626 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-7.
Because 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-7 | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | CX-7 | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 244 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1194 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 60 L |
