2009 Mazda CX-7 vs. 1968 Volvo 145
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 2,258 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 145. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Volvo 145 weights approximately 130 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-7.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Volvo 145. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 145. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 145.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-7 | 1968 Volvo 145 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | CX-7 | 145 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2258 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 244 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2620 mm |