2009 Mazda CX-7 vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-7 weights approximately 374 kg more than 1975 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-7 | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | CX-7 | 66 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 244 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1194 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1390 mm |