2009 Mazda CX-7 vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-7 weights approximately 307 kg more than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 1976 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 1976 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-7 | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | CX-7 | Celica |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 244 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1332 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2510 mm |