2009 Mazda CX-7 vs. 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 1100 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-7.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-7 | 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
| Make | Mazda | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | CX-7 | Corniche |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2258 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 244 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3030 mm |
