2009 Mazda CX-7 vs. 1982 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (235 HP) has 154 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (351 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. (121 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-7 | 1982 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | CX-7 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 351 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2530 mm |