2009 Mazda CX-7 vs. 1986 Nissan Prairie
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Prairie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Prairie would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1986 Nissan Prairie. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1986 Nissan Prairie.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Nissan Prairie. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (351 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Prairie. (121 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Prairie.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-7 | 1986 Nissan Prairie | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | CX-7 | Prairie |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1485 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 351 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2520 mm |