2009 Mazda CX-7 vs. 1996 Pontiac GPX
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Pontiac GPX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Pontiac GPX would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Pontiac GPX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1996 Pontiac GPX. (145 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1996 Pontiac GPX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Pontiac GPX weights approximately 501 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-7.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Pontiac GPX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Pontiac GPX (454 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-7. (350 Nm). This means 1996 Pontiac GPX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-7.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-7 | 1996 Pontiac GPX | |
| Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
| Model | CX-7 | GPX |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2258 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 244 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 454 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1681 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 76 L |
