2009 Mazda CX-7 vs. 1997 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1997 Toyota Celica. (114 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1997 Toyota Celica.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (351 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Toyota Celica. (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-7 | 1997 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | CX-7 | Celica |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1762 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 351 Nm | 154 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 78 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1760 mm |
