2009 Mazda CX-7 vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda CX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda CX-7 would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore. 2009 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-7 | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | CX-7 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2258 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 244 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
