2009 Mazda CX-7 vs. 2012 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda CX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda CX-7 would be higher.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Leaf. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-7 | 2012 Nissan Leaf | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | CX-7 | Leaf |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 244 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4445 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 2.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 2.2 L/100km |
