2009 Mazda CX-7 vs. 2013 Volvo S60

To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda CX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda CX-7 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2009 Mazda CX-7. (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda CX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo S60 weights approximately 281 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S60 (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-7. (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-7.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda CX-7 2013 Volvo S60
Make Mazda Volvo
Model CX-7 S60
Year Released 2009 2013
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2260 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line W
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 5 valves
Horse Power 244 HP 247 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 350 Nm 361 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD AWD
Transmission Type Automatic CVT
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1332 kg 1613 kg
Vehicle Length 4680 mm 4628 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 2097 mm
Vehicle Height 1650 mm 1484 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2776 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 10.7 L/100km 6.6 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 14.7 L/100km 10.5 L/100km