2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1947 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1947 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1947 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 450 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1947 Volvo PV 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1947 Volvo PV 60 has manual transmission. 1947 Volvo PV 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1947 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | CX-9 | PV 60 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1947 |
Engine Size | 3724 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2850 mm |