2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1953 Renault Juva
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Renault Juva would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 519 kg more than 1953 Renault Juva.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Renault Juva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1953 Renault Juva | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | CX-9 | Juva |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1953 |
| Engine Size | 3725 cc | 1001 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2360 mm |
